That's what we in the business call a hook. Now you're sold on this review, and just had to read more. Hopefully, at any rate. If you are, then I've done my job and garnered a sufficient number of hits to keep me in the good graces of Mavra and Herb.
At any rate, welcome to a delayed review.
I was meant to review this last week, but got held up. Circumstance is a fickle mistress, and several random events cut me short from being able to write about films and TV shows that I have seen and enjoyed.
So without any further ado:
Kate Winslet shouldn't have an Oscar nomination for this because of two reasons. 1) She's good, but not great. 2) She's not a lead actress here; she's a strong supporting character in the life story of another character.
No, this is a Ralph Fiennes showcase.
He is absolutely phenomenal here. While his younger counterpart gets to have lots of sex (the college student he sleeps with is a particularly attractive woman), Fiennes gets to sell the moments where a man whose kept his emotions internal has to leap out of that mindset and embrace the mistakes he's made in his life...
... and he rocks it. Hard.
Sometimes we forget how good an actor is. Fiennes has done great work in the past, but the Harry Potter films (while paying him a large amount) have made us view him in a lesser light. He isn't bad in them; he's entertaining and fun to watch. It's just that they're beneath him. Seeing him rock the emotions here makes you wish he was getting the acclaim that Winslet was getting.
(Am I the only one who laughs at her 'acting' during the Revolutionary Road trailers?)
The rest of the film is good as well, even if Fiennes lifts it up past the slightly romanticised routes. While watching, one does get the impression that the filmmakers are torn over whether to view the War Criminals as inhumane (a rant by a law student seems to be an extreme version of this) or whether we're meant to sympathise with them (while it's deplorable, Winslet does sell some moments where her character is seen to have more of a moral nature than the court prosecuting her.)
This is an odd choice, but one which does play on the duality of the piece. Her sentence was due to the inaction of someone else, and that makes you think about whether justice can be found if the little people don't speak up.
It also makes you think about future generations. Having a mob mentality towards human beings is inching a step closer to the template the Nazis used. Obviously there is a difference; however it can also be argued that small steps can bring us towards a mindset where order over life could be seen as the best solution.
In the end, the film is trying to teach us that we don't have to comprehend what these people did, but it might help if we show them more humanity than they showed anyone else. If we condemn them to the gallows, are we any better?
I have no answers for anyone, just saying my piece.
At any rate, I think I'm disappointed that a film raising an interesting issue is filled with so much sex and nudity. Kate Winslet is a very attractive woman to look at, yet at times you think its overkill and want someone to get her a blanket. Maybe it's just me, I found myself tuning out halfway through when the bathing motif kept repeating itself.
My final thought is that it's a really good film, but could've done with less nudity and a quelling of some romanticism towards her character.